|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 9:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 7:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 6:19 am
|
|
|
|
Not to sound homophobic or oppressive at all - in fact, I'm the complete opposite, but I don't think fighting for gay marriage is really worth it.
In terms of the fight for equality, yes, we should be allowed to marry. But in terms of worth - do we really need marriage? |I mean it has some benefits that are only available through marriage (ie. being at somebody's death bed and that whole situation, child benefits, and etc.) but at what cost?
The reason I'm against marriage is because it defines your intimacy. It says, "You do not love this person or are committed to this person unless you have your love validated by the State or Church". In other words, you don't love that person unless the Church or State say so. ******** the Church and State. They are the ones who have been oppressing the queer community since forever. And now we have to subjugate ourselves to them again just so we can validate our intimacies?
Another reason I'm against marriage is because it defines how our intimacy works. It regulates it as a heteronormative monogamous relationship. This is problematic because it doesn't allow for open relationships or polyamorous relationships - in fact, it simply labels their marriage as adultery should a couple willingly have a threesome with somebody. As well, I wasn't aware that in order to love somebody, I have to love only them and have sex with only them - or that I love only one person period.
This monogamy further leads into problems such as complete vulnerability. My partner would have complete access to me, my finances, properties, and everything - as I would with my partner. This makes divorce extremely difficult because you have to undo all this inter-meshing. Further more, if my partner were to become abusive or attempt to kill me, he would have complete access to myself - or vice versa.
The only reason I would get married is for the tangible benefits of being able to care for my partner and any children we may have together - should we have any children. Why can I not make a contractual obligation for these benefits, instead of being locked into a patriarchal institution that only further suppresses myself and my partner?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 6:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 12:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 12:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2011 2:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2011 7:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|