|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Essy ze Ninja Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:28 pm
|
Cinnabun Gryffie Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Essy ze Ninja Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:29 pm
|
|
|
|
On a side note, I really think the quidditch system could use a little more leeway, y'know?
a bigger opening for steals, maybe a range of numbers, like, 1-5, or 1-6
a bigger range for bludger hits, maybe 1-4 or 1-3 will make hits.
And, if the range for bludger does get improved, its probably safe to say that each member should have at least four or five lives?
Edit::
Also, I think seekers should get the smallest little increase in "spotting" too. But in that sense, if the beaters have a higher chance to score, than they can have a good chance of stopping seekers from catching the snitch. and if a seeker gets hit after they've "spot" the snitch, they lose a life and have to start over in the search. So, beaters have five "turns" to try and stop the seekers. And seekers get more chances to find the snitch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:06 am
|
Essy ze Ninja Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:46 am
|
|
|
|
Ah, okay, thanks Essy! I was worried she might be sick or something. Moving makes sense though, it can take a while to get set up again.
And, Ronyo? Please don't take this the wrong way, and this is just a suggestion, but, um, deleting posts in a dice-based forum game is generally not a good idea. It isn't specifically banned here, but most other places I've seen do ban it. Even if nothing hinky is going on, and it usually isn't, deleting posts gives the appearance that the person might be deleting undesirable dice results and trying again in order to cheat for a better result. Most places instead recommend just making a second post to roll. You can either post something like ((OOC: Whoops, forgot to roll!)) in the second post, or go back and edit your first to something like ((OOC: Forgot to roll. Ignore this post, I reposted below.)), and then just repost your original post with a roll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|