|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 6:05 pm
|
|
|
|
Karl_Krebs Arlanos -shrug- She's probably done it more than once. I say; let her have it. It's not like she can protest against you if she finds out. 1. Assuming the worst bout your partner is always a slippery slope nothing good can come of unfairly assuming that she has cheated more than once. 2. Let her have it? Those words drip of uncaring and disdain. Two wrong don't make a right, an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. But ingoring all that once he cheats on her as well he has done a malicious act to "get back at" and hurt someone he claims to love and the stigma that he will receive for such will never fade. It will come up in conversations that he cheated on one of his exes. And once again no good comes of INTENTIONALLY trying to HURT someone you "care" or "cared about". 3. She damn well can protest. Just because she had a lapse in judgment doesn't men you should lash out at her. You have a choice when someone cheats on you dump them or try to work through it and stay together. But committing an amoral act is not one of them and she damn well has the right to complain if he does cheat on her even if she did so in the past. Was all this necessary? The post asked for my opinion and I gave it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 6:44 pm
|
|
|
|
Arlanos Karl_Krebs Arlanos -shrug- She's probably done it more than once. I say; let her have it. It's not like she can protest against you if she finds out. 1. Assuming the worst bout your partner is always a slippery slope nothing good can come of unfairly assuming that she has cheated more than once. 2. Let her have it? Those words drip of uncaring and disdain. Two wrong don't make a right, an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. But ingoring all that once he cheats on her as well he has done a malicious act to "get back at" and hurt someone he claims to love and the stigma that he will receive for such will never fade. It will come up in conversations that he cheated on one of his exes. And once again no good comes of INTENTIONALLY trying to HURT someone you "care" or "cared about". 3. She damn well can protest. Just because she had a lapse in judgment doesn't men you should lash out at her. You have a choice when someone cheats on you dump them or try to work through it and stay together. But committing an amoral act is not one of them and she damn well has the right to complain if he does cheat on her even if she did so in the past. Was all this necessary? The post asked for my opinion and I gave it. Apologies if offended in any way. The man was asking for advice and I strongly in oppostion to the advice you were giving Op. I had assumed that since it was posted in a forum that you wouldn't mind some one arguing with or against your point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 4:23 pm
|
|
|
|
Karl_Krebs Arlanos Karl_Krebs Arlanos -shrug- She's probably done it more than once. I say; let her have it. It's not like she can protest against you if she finds out. 1. Assuming the worst bout your partner is always a slippery slope nothing good can come of unfairly assuming that she has cheated more than once. 2. Let her have it? Those words drip of uncaring and disdain. Two wrong don't make a right, an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. But ingoring all that once he cheats on her as well he has done a malicious act to "get back at" and hurt someone he claims to love and the stigma that he will receive for such will never fade. It will come up in conversations that he cheated on one of his exes. And once again no good comes of INTENTIONALLY trying to HURT someone you "care" or "cared about". 3. She damn well can protest. Just because she had a lapse in judgment doesn't men you should lash out at her. You have a choice when someone cheats on you dump them or try to work through it and stay together. But committing an amoral act is not one of them and she damn well has the right to complain if he does cheat on her even if she did so in the past. Was all this necessary? The post asked for my opinion and I gave it. Apologies if offended in any way. The man was asking for advice and I strongly in oppostion to the advice you were giving Op. I had assumed that since it was posted in a forum that you wouldn't mind some one arguing with or against your point. And I won't argue with you. He will decide what he will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 10:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:53 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:41 pm
|
|
|
|
Der Fluch des Pharao Curious that either of you would essentially defend the right to freely speaks one's mind and then excuse the other of that right simply because you disagree.
Everyone's opinion is valid and no one has the right to demean someone else because they see things in a different light.
Arlanos has their opinions and way of life that may not align with yours, Lady Kayura. That doesn't mean you should accuse them of giving "malicious and bad" advice.
Likewise, Lady Kayura is entitled to their opinion about how your advice, Arlanos, may in fact be destructive, just as Karl_Krebs had the same right.
Are we all clear now?
Our views may all be different, everyone comes from different walks of life. Just because Arlanos figures that Rezal_Zioun has the right to cheat on their girlfriend because she cheated on them doesn't mean Arlanos is giving malicious advice.
Frankly I find that that girl has whatever she deserves coming to her. If Rezal_Zioun should decided to cheat, well it's well in their right to do so. At the same time, I don't suggest Rezal_Zioun do so.
Would I myself cheat on someone who cheated on me?
Perhaps. But who is to say if we're not in that particular position?
Nevertheless, let's quit nit-picking each others opinions and leave one another be.
Do we all understand? Have I made myself clear? I quoted the man once, then apologized if my response had offended or hurt his feelings because his response gave me the impression that he was upset by my response.
I don't get the premise of responding to posted thoughts on a forum as a taboo. I won't argue the point with Arlanos because he said he didn't want to argue. Opinions can be malicious and there's nothing innately sacred about them. If one has the view that someone is giving bad advice they should state their disagreement with it should they not? Edit: not saying Arlanos's opinion is or isn't malicious, just for clarity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|