|
|
What do you think? *insert catchy phrase here* |
I like the idea! |
|
47% |
[ 31 ] |
Not really a fan of this, sorry :C |
|
52% |
[ 34 ] |
|
Total Votes : 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:05 am
|
|
|
|
Lolli McHotpants StarieMichie Can I just say that I REALLY do love every Soq I've won so far? Because I do. ^ This. Man. Every single one of my soq are my babies. Almost as much as my real one. xD Same! XD I am very protective of them. hehehe. Even the ones who will bite me if I get too close! *nodnod*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:40 am
|
|
|
|
Beejoux Play nice children. We have lowluck for breedings, I think we've even had lowluck or custom newbie custom slots. I don't see why events should be different. It might not be easy to regulate, but if we can find a way, I'd like to see it happen. Jade~ She -has- given up millions for soqs. Now let's everyone be nice to eachother.
Please don't chastise me. I'm not a child. I wasn't being passive aggressive, I was explaining my position. I have given up millions too but I think that an event like this could be a nightmare very quickly given how large the shop is.
Yes, it sucks to not get selected with the RNG but low luck with events is different given that it's much easier to qualify for a breeding because you don't HAVE to provide links unless you are going for RP breeding. Then you would, of course, provide the right links to prove it. It does you no good to lie because you either have the RP or you don't. In the case of events, there are SO many mini events within events that you would have to link to every single event to prove you didn't win. Plus, for any random giveaways, you'd have to refind these links which is a pain in the butt. It is easy to overlook stuff like that! Furthermore, people -will- try to bend the rules, either on purpose or not. It happens.
Now imagine having to check the forms for accuracy for the 150+ people who might have entered the events and not won.
I just don't see how it could work without being a major headache.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:47 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:36 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:48 am
|
|
|
|
Kamiki: Just for the sake of saying this to answer, not to prolong or drag out any points I just figured I would be clear on what I meant by 'event'. I mean anything other than a custom/breeding/bribe slot.
When I posted this topic, thats what I had in mind, along with this would have been for people who had tried for like a year, religiously (not just skipping out random events for half a year), and still their only way to obtain a Soq is by having to pay up toward the millions for it.
Again, this isnt a reply to push my post, nor am I trying to stir up the debate its turned into, just clarifying what I had in mind when I posted.
I guess I didnt realize how much work everyone thought it would be because as you've stated, we DO have LL already for breedings, and people have to check 20+ links for that. I didnt realize there would be that much of a difference.
Also, its nice to see this thread isnt completely pointless, I liked the two ideas you outlined that have come from this as well c: Thats really all I was hoping for, some realistic feedback/ideas. I realize my idea isnt perfect, but it might be able to help other issues *shrug*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:02 am
|
|
|
|
I think that if there are more flatsales and freebies, and etc, you will come to find that a LL category is not necessary. The problem is that there haven't been a lot of the smaller events, in my opinion, but from the sound of things, that is being worked on. No one can attend every event, no matter how hard they try, so simply having more Soquili available in general will increase everyone's odds. I have personally never won a flatsale pet, or an event pet. I have tried in quite a number of events, but my luck has simply never been that great, outside of winning a couple breedings over the four years I have been in the shop (three of which were active). I understand what you're getting at here in suggesting a LL category, but as it has been stated, that would open the door to more and more subdivisions, and I think we can all agree that doing so would not be to anyone's benefit, really. I think, also, if there are more events that do not rely upon luck, but rather some other measure that will help things along, too. See: RP events, concept contests, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:17 am
|
|
|
|
JadeEye Please don't chastise me. I'm not a child. I wasn't being passive aggressive, I was explaining my position. I have given up millions too but I think that an event like this could be a nightmare very quickly given how large the shop is. Yes, it sucks to not get selected with the RNG but low luck with events is different given that it's much easier to qualify for a breeding because you don't HAVE to provide links unless you are going for RP breeding. Then you would, of course, provide the right links to prove it. It does you no good to lie because you either have the RP or you don't. In the case of events, there are SO many mini events within events that you would have to link to every single event to prove you didn't win. Plus, for any random giveaways, you'd have to refind these links which is a pain in the butt. It is easy to overlook stuff like that! Furthermore, people -will- try to bend the rules, either on purpose or not. It happens. Now imagine having to check the forms for accuracy for the 150+ people who might have entered the events and not won. I just don't see how it could work without being a major headache.
I'm not chastising, I'm always this bubbly and weird. And I wasn't just talking specifically about you. Though I will say these forums are not for drilling people's ideas into the ground. State your opinion, and leave it at that.
As for LL breedings, they DO need to provide links to the prior breeding attempts. Providing links to prior events or raffle/flaffles isn't far beyond that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:20 am
|
|
|
|
Well honestly, I think it would be too much effort to do this on a large scale.
But I'd like to comment on two points.
1. Flaffles having a cool-down peroid and 2. Auctions.
I love flaffles, they're a free for all. You never know what to get. But as far as a cool-down, I'm not sure that's exactly fair. Just to explain what I mean. Typically there aren't things like....Kalona or stuff in the flaffles right? Or edited stuff? So the part that feels unfair to me is that someone who might have won say...in September an unedited soq, wouldn't have a chance at some of the much higher edited ones in the October/Halloween flaffle. Because getting a higher edited one, for a price that can be afforded by anybody is nice.
Now to say a little more on that, the other reason I don't like it is because they aren't customs. You don't choose. In fact, they're rather like a mini-event and we're allowed to get one at each of those if we're so lucky, right?
Now before anyone says anything, 2.5 of my 3.5 have been won from flaffles--two of them back to back. So some people might think I'm biased, and that's fine. But I'm truly trying to look at it objectively. I mean, I've always looked at them like mini-events which is why I never thought of a "limit" for them
BUT if there is going to be a limit, I think that there should be exceptions---like in the case of another Halloween type raffle. The staff put ALOT of work into those. And they are some of the most fabulous Soqs I've ever seen. So in short, if there is a HUGE event themed/holiday themed raffle with edits I think anyone should be able to apply.
2. Auctions. IF you start limiting flaffles, then I think it's only fair to limit Auctions more then too. Because there are fewer of them. Now the only thing about this is you can't really do it to one and a cool down peroid of two months since there isn't auctions that often and it would do nothing. You'd have to say you couldn't bid on anything next event or something like that.
In short though, I disagree with limiting either flaffles or auctions (and I'm clearly not biased as I'll never be able to afford or try for one). They're free for alls, and unlike events you don't get to see the prizes ahead of time and make an informed decision for flaffles. For Auctions, it's the same. You couldn't see to the NEXT event. What if you got a WoW one, then the next event was your FAVOURITE movie cosplays and you couldn't try for that because you won the last one? It's not fair because you can't see what the next event or flaffle is.
Breeding limiting and Custom limiting work because they're based on your decision-your idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nyx Queen of Darkness Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:57 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|