xXbelovedXxx
Barrett Jaeger
I'm very creative and have an understanding of the English language and literacy in general that is beyond what most other people in my age group can even comprehend (according to quite a few of my past English teachers).
By way of a mental evaluation test administered by a specialist who, for reasons unknown to me, was called in to my last school (the high school I graduated from) I have found out that my level of intelligence is, to quote the man, "in the mid-to-high ranges of genius".
Aside from that, I'm mostly used as muscle for moving things.
In contrasts, though, I'm fairly lazy and very unmotivated. I'm also a bit overweight, although I'm correcting that much.
By way of a mental evaluation test administered by a specialist who, for reasons unknown to me, was called in to my last school (the high school I graduated from) I have found out that my level of intelligence is, to quote the man, "in the mid-to-high ranges of genius".
Aside from that, I'm mostly used as muscle for moving things.
In contrasts, though, I'm fairly lazy and very unmotivated. I'm also a bit overweight, although I'm correcting that much.
My talent is editing works of literature. I don't mean to point you out, but quotes go after the punctuation.
Not necessarily. It depends on whether you are using the punctuation logically or conventionally (the latter being the rule which you pointed out, which is only used in America). I was using it logically, which dictates that if the punctuation doesn't belong to the quote itself, but instead governs the sentence as a whole, it should be placed outside of the quotation marks.