|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:40 pm
|
|
|
|
The Pollen Shed Two questions for Khalid Ibn Walid: 1: I'm not sure if this has been addressed yet (mostly because I haven't read every post. All the bold text is a little too much for my eyes...), but is the Quran the only Scriptures for Muslims? Or do they also believe the Tawrat, Zabur and Injil? If so, do they believe all of them, or just parts? And are they equal in weight, or does one supersede another? 2: You mentioned that you are interested in opening a dialogue, but you don't think you'll change your mind on anything. So then, is this like an outreach for you? I hope you'll excuse the analogy, but is it like braving the storm in order to save misguided souls?
We Muslims Believe in The Quran And the Tawrat = Torah Zabur = Psalms Injil = Gospel
We Muslims Believe the Original Torah,Gospel,Psalms, have been corrupted and changed,edited,etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_holy_books
I'm Not changing my mind or something like that I just want Christians to learn from Us Muslims about what we Believe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:18 pm
|
|
|
|
Khalid Ibn Walid The Pollen Shed Two questions for Khalid Ibn Walid: 1: I'm not sure if this has been addressed yet (mostly because I haven't read every post. All the bold text is a little too much for my eyes...), but is the Quran the only Scriptures for Muslims? Or do they also believe the Tawrat, Zabur and Injil? If so, do they believe all of them, or just parts? And are they equal in weight, or does one supersede another? 2: You mentioned that you are interested in opening a dialogue, but you don't think you'll change your mind on anything. So then, is this like an outreach for you? I hope you'll excuse the analogy, but is it like braving the storm in order to save misguided souls? We Muslims Believe in The Quran And the Tawrat = Torah Zabur = Psalms Injil = Gospel We Muslims Believe the Original Torah,Gospel,Psalms, have been corrupted and changed,edited,etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_holy_booksI'm Not changing my mind or something like that I just want Christians to learn from Us Muslims about what we Believe
So then, wouldn't you want to start from the Tawrat, Zabur or Injil in order to help us understand you? It's probably the most common ground we have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:16 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:18 pm
|
|
|
|
*Sips tea*
From Wikipedia:
Qur'an and the claim of the distortion of the text itself
Gary Miller (Abdul-Ahad Omar) believes that the Qur'an criticizes the handling of scripture by some Jews and Christians rather than their holy books. According to Gary Miller, Qur'an only makes the following three accusations:
"The Qur'an says some of the Jews and Christians pass over much of what is in their scriptures."
And we hop between things to change the meaning, too! Although it's true that lots of people probably skip over books like Leviticus which are, frankly, kind of boring.
"Some of them have changed the words, and this is the one that is misused by Muslims very often giving the impression that once there was a true bible and then somebody hid that one away, then they published a false one. The Qur'an doesn't say that. What it criticizes is that people who have the proper words in front of them, but they don't deliver that up to people. They mistranslate it, or misrepresent it, or they add to the meaning of it. They put a different slant on it."
In fairness, some mistranslations may have happened because the translators were uncertain of the definitions. Compounding this is the fact that phrases and sayings that may have meant one thing in one time period may seem strange later on and be understood incorrectly because of culture. However, I think Muslims could at least acknowledge that Christians have ongoing translation efforts as part of the attempt to get translations that are as accurate as possible. It's not like we just accept one version and leave it at that.
"Some people falsely attribute to God what is really written by men."
Read: Most of the New Testament. Which is true. Paul was a great teacher, but... however great he was, he wasn't God. And I *do* often see Christians referring to what he wrote as if it was the direct word of God, letter for letter, instead of his own writings. It's also hard to say that the Gospels are necessarily correct in the same way; in fact, I only really think the Torah was written directly by God, while the four main gospels of the New Testament are... kind of a rough overview of what happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:21 am
|
|
|
|
The Pollen Shed Khalid Ibn Walid http://www.answering-christianity.com/warning.htm I find it ironic that the Quran forbids conjecture (An opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information), yet much of the textual criticism in the link is conjecture. The early Christians (in the first 400 years or so before Constantine) did not have multiple canons. Nor do we today. (I can expound further if you wish.) And I'm not even going to address the 9/11 conspiracy claims.
Yes they did The Gospel of Judas is an example and The Gospel of Mary Magdalene I can name a dozen more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:14 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|