|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:30 pm
|
|
|
|
Nigh night, Astra! xD
'Zei; It's not the wisest decision, but you must remember, these weapons are completely unknown, and therefore, she's not sending them for absolute retrieval. On top of which, you're deferring to the highest ranked member among them, granting someone some semblance of leadership training. If you're ordered into the fray, or if something is going that wrong, then you get in there, yes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:32 pm
|
|
|
|
Sugar Dhaku Crystal of Infinity Morning Minna! ((everyone)).. Just caught up to this page, which means reading through 13+ pages... and as to a comment about reading 30 pages or so of OOC, I so would. since i have no life.... Dhaku, I wanna know who you'd pair me with! (was interested in finding out what your opinion of me is) Like mine! Rei is a ninjutsu class tamer ninja, and she has Suiton and Fuuton jutsu, which she can learn eight of each (i think, or is it 6 and then two tamer-class jutsu? Because tamer class adds 2 ninjutsu to her limitations.) I don't even know you. Right, good point.. heh... sweatdrop since i just joined and all... well, sorry for asking 'n' all...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:38 pm
|
|
|
|
Mana_ecl Zetsuya Nigh night, Astra! xD
'Zei; It's not the wisest decision, but you must remember, these weapons are completely unknown, and therefore, she's not sending them for absolute retrieval. On top of which, you're deferring to the highest ranked member among them, granting someone some semblance of leadership training. If you're ordered into the fray, or if something is going that wrong, then you get in there, yes? Regardless thats a MASSIVE leadership blunder. If you dont know the strength of the enemy you send the best you can not the weakest that how you cause needles casualties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:51 pm
|
|
|
|
Azeiel The Fallen Mana_ecl Zetsuya Nigh night, Astra! xD
'Zei; It's not the wisest decision, but you must remember, these weapons are completely unknown, and therefore, she's not sending them for absolute retrieval. On top of which, you're deferring to the highest ranked member among them, granting someone some semblance of leadership training. If you're ordered into the fray, or if something is going that wrong, then you get in there, yes? Regardless thats a MASSIVE leadership blunder. If you dont know the strength of the enemy you send the best you can not the weakest that how you cause needles casualties. Both underestimating and overestimating an opponent can be bad. If you waste additional resources on something, it could weaken something else. Therefor, it would be safe to assume one should gain information prior to acting. as an example:
Foe 1 approaches from the north to steal the item you are guarding. Allies A,B, and C, along with yourself decide to utterly crush this guy, because he is feared world wide for his prowess. You leave behind your weakest member Ally D, to protect both him/her and the object. Confident that you will be able to dispatch Foe 1, you head out with your forces. Foe 2 and Foe 3 move up from the south while you are engaged with Foe 1 and they proceed to kill Ally D and steal the guarded Object. Congratulations, although you succeeded in slaying Foe 1, you overestimated the threat he presented and underestimated the forces at his disposal. You have lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|