|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:47 am
Wow, I've never heard of being pansexual before. Thanks for making me aware of something new!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:06 am
MinervaEvenstar Wow, I've never heard of being pansexual before. Thanks for making me aware of something new! Same here! I never knew there was such a thing, but now I think I might be Pansexual. If I have the meaning correct...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:30 pm
me personally i dont describe or label myself as anything im morely just atrracted to the person personality like if they were ugly (i dont think anyone ugly ) and they have a great personalitty i would fall in love with them fast and if they are pretty.haandsom or w/e and they personality suc then i wont like thme but see them as ugly razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:12 pm
Finally people will know of what being Pansexual means.....I thught I was alone in this!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:39 am
Yeah I will admit I have never heard of that term before but it makes sence. Good to keep up with the times. ^__^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:47 pm
Telamond PinoyCowboyka788 hm that's pretty intresting. I never heard of that term before until now. this is off beat, but why exactly is the term "Metosexual" "Sexual"? er......better worded.......hm. I can't explain it, but isn't metrosexual basicly just over obessed of one's personal apparience? hm sorry to throw the thread off a bit, just reading that made me think of another term that's all. Metropolitan means big city. Which means that they're modern men. It is in no way a sexuality. They just like to dress funny. Term is often used for men who gets manicures, spa treatment etc. actually metro means etimology-of and metro sexual means a man who takes care about their sexappeal and thats very sticked to the sexuality (actually even their way to get laid is bassed on that)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:05 pm
Pansexual pangender here.
Questions, comments, what may have you, feel free to ask.
One thing I'd like to add though is that it is hard to explain to someone outside the LGBT (and even some in the LGBT) what pansexual pangender is. I always say, "I am not a man or a woman, I am Nibby. And it doesn't matter what is below someone's belt because it doesn't make them who they are. What's in their minds and their hearts is what I find attractive. Age doesn't matter as long as they're able to keep up with me."
Also with the fetishes, philias, and other assorted things, being pansexual does not necessarily mean that you automatically like or are interested in these things. It may mean you are more open to the idea of them but by no means does someone saying "I am pansexual" mean that you can automatically label them with the stereotype that pansexuals have no sexual boundaries. We're still human. Well, at least some of us. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:56 pm
I feel there is a common theme of misunderstanding
with this topic....
Pansexuality simply means to be attracted soley to personality;
gender, orientation, and physical appearance having nothing
to do with the attraction.
Basically, it means that gender does not play a role in sexual
interest. It does not mean one who is very sexual.
The closest that comes to it is bisexuality.
The difference: bisexuality is an attraction to both genders.
Pansexuality is an attraction to personality.
Being bi still has the gender preference: both genders.
Pansexuality completely disregards gender.
I, for one, am pansexual.
I am not attracted to both genders,
I am attracted to personalities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:54 pm
hi, i have a question o.o, do people get SIDA by the liquids of breast, contact with a vaginal? and semen and pre semen?, splain,
If it is oral sex, do you have to swalow the semen O.O eww... to get the SIDA, or have a**l sex without or even with condom? to have SIDA or what...i am confused..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:39 pm
Pansexuality is still pretty vague but i can get the basic of that...
I used to be Asexual myself but after a while it faded more and more until it was just gone~ You dont have to yearn for sex to be in a relationship 8D lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:43 pm
noone care to answere in this guild...bye...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:30 pm
I, like Mistress Nibby and Zombie, am a Pansexual. It doesn't make me a nympho.
One thing that might clear pansexuality up for people is JUST because we like people doesn't mean we're *****! I think that those who classify pansexuals with people who like children, and animals are thinking of people who're "Universal."
They're very diffrent. Now, don't get me wron,g some people who are pansexual's MIGHT like children, but I think I can vouche for most of us and say that have sexual relations with children isn't our cup of tea.
Zombie put it the best. We don't limit ourselve's to a specific gender. We date people more so on personality then what gender that person is.
And I have to quote what Nibby says. "It may mean you are more open to the idea of them but by no means does someone saying "I am pansexual" mean that you can automatically label them with the stereotype that pansexuals have no sexual boundaries. We're still human." <- That's an AWESOME way to put it. Pansexuality doesn't mean we don't have boundries XP It mostly just means that we don't limit ourselves to gender ALONE.... We have limitations though! D: We're not sex crazed nymphos. XP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:56 pm
Frankly, I still feel like the definition of pansexuality serves to make bisexuality sound as shallow as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:37 pm
I hate the term metrosexual... they're heterosexual men who just do things that may be perfectly normal except that they were traditionally seen as "feminine"... other than that it has nothing to do with orientation or anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:56 pm
Sometimes, I'm pretty sure I'm mostly asexual. It's kind of annoying, actually. Especially because all my closest friends are nymphos... ._.'' I always feel lame around them, you know? One of my friend's boyfriends even told me that the only possible reason I could have for not being interested in sex was because I was obviously molested as a child, (I was not) which was a really lame thing for him to say, you know? Its not that I'm not interested in sexuality... I like reading about it, I like writing about it, I'm often attracted to people, sometimes I even really like kissing, but I've never REALLY been interested in anything more from another person. I don't like cuddling or hugging especially, and I don't stay attracted to people for very long after I've become close with them. My friends often introduce me as "the prude friend" which is also pretty lame, but it's not like it matters, you know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
