^Vanilla, just Vanilla
< Though many of the assumptions he makes are well rooted and hard to argue, but there are those that it is easy to find the issues. Like one argument he argued that the idea of God/gods choosing holy and unholy is fallacious and proves it quite well, but says that it defeats the idea that holy and unholy is fully related to God/gods. But thats not exactly true, if morality(difference between holy and unholy) were a part of Gods nature than it is possible for morality to be souly rooted in God, but his argument doesn't touch this issue, only that it is chosen by. So that is one of them.
v who's your favorite philosopher?
Why Not?
No rules, just Fun! Join today.
Reply | ||||||
|
|
Goto Page: [|«] [<<] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 [>] [»|] |