|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 12:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:48 pm
|
|
|
|
Giyari VenusRain I think people should just stick to how they talk when it comes to vocab, but that's probably derived from seeing things like "monolithic mountain" every other sentence in waaaaay too many fantasy novels. I disagree here, as it depends on the setting smile After all, aristocratic Victorians didn't speak the way we did razz
Yeah, but you still didn't have the sort of thesaurus abuse that I see in far too much writing. In any case, flow would be somewhat similar in similar situations, and you could quite easily type up a sentence in Modern English (yes, I KNOW that Victorian English is Modern English, go with me here), and then research to find a phrase with a similar meaning, as well as weeding out anachronisms.
No thesaurus required for that, only reading Victorian fiction and picking up some resources. Thesauruses are not to be used, for the most part, because they seem to encourage the use of words that don't work in a given context. CONTEXT: IT'S MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOU THINK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 12:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|