When To Introduce Your Kids To Evolution

[Lady Vizsla]

by Scot Chadwick

A blog post on the BioLogos website last month explored the question, “When should you introduce your child to evolution?”1 Because the author presented evolutionary theory “as describing how God went about developing life,” his overall answer to when to teach our children these things emphasized his high regard for this dogma. He asserted, “Evolutionary theory is certainly important and foundational and as Christian parents we want to expose our children to great science from a young age.”2

The blog post referenced an NPR article written on this same question,3 though that article was primarily an endorsement of the children’s book titled Grandmother Fish: A Child’s First Book of Evolution.4 In contrast to the perspective of BioLogos, which at least appeals to God, the NPR article upheld evolutionary theory as the appropriate corrective to the unsophisticated notion that God created the Earth and its inhabitants:

We all know by now that more than 40 percent of Americans say that God created human beings in our present form in the last 10,000 years. That is, 4 in 10 Americans reject the knowledge that anchors our scientific understanding of the world and all its creatures. That dismal situation cries out for big efforts in science education.5

But both of these views misrepresent evolutionary ideas as science and even make these ideas a prerequisite to performing any scientific enterprise. Evolutionary ideas seek to explain the origin of the universe and the diversity of all it contains according to natural processes occurring over a long time. The term evolution can refer simply to change over time, which we can observe in nature today. But when the term evolution is used to describe the origins of all living things from a common ancestor, we are now speaking of something that we can neither observe, test, nor repeat in the present world. We regard the evolutionary viewpoint as an erroneous, humanistic worldview that contradicts the testimony of Scripture and that misconstrues observable science.

A seemingly innocuous rebuttal to a biblical creation viewpoint suggests, “Couldn’t God have used evolution?” But as Ken Ham says, “It’s not a matter of what God could have done, but what He said He did!”6 For example, the record of Genesis presents an order of events quite at odds with the process asserted by evolutionary ideas. Also the millions of years of death necessary for the evolution of life directly denies God’s warning that death came as a punishment for Adam’s sin (Genesis 2:17; Romans 5:12–17; 1 Corinthians 15:21–22). Evolutionary ideas do not harmonize with biblical creation and undermine the gospel of Jesus Christ.

This is not to suggest that parents should not teach their children about evolution. Evolutionary ideas pervade our culture, and we may not ignore it. We should teach our children to think critically, evaluating assumptions and arguments for and against evolution. As Ken Ham states,

[E]volutionary ideas should be taught—but warts and all. There are many inconsistencies within the evolutionary framework and many disagreements about how to interpret the evidence. When appropriate, point out that many scientists, both creationists and evolutionists, do not believe that Darwinian evolution is adequate for explaining the existence of life on earth.7

Our approach toward teaching our children ought to be filled with truth of God’s Word first, then incrementally identifying and refuting false ideas. The apostle Paul recognized that Timothy had been taught the truth of the Scriptures even from his childhood:

But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. (2 Timothy 3:14–15, emphasis added)

The word childhood can refer to young children, infants, and even unborn children. A child’s understanding and discernment certainly grows with age and maturity, so parents can and should be very careful to expose their children to the truth of God’s Word from the earliest ages and continue throughout their lives. This training in the truth will serve them well as they navigate through a sinful and deceptive world.

Sometimes parents are afraid of conversations with their children, especially on important or controversial topics. We might lament, “Oh, no! How have I failed my child that he would even ask this question?” Parents can also repudiate their children’s God-given curiosity and sense of wonder by ridiculing them. Additionally parents can answer a question too simply, almost dismissing a child’s thoughtful question. But if we don’t provide substantial and satisfying answers, our children will search out these answers themselves.

Instead we must be willing and equipped to engage them on various levels of understanding and in various situations. While the long-term goal of parenting should be that our children would be able to govern themselves under God in their thoughts and actions, they need physical and intellectual help to follow Christ’s example by growing “in wisdom and stature” (cf. Luke 2:52).

Parents should answer children according to the depth of their questions and their level of understanding. Provide as much truth as they are interested to hear and able to comprehend. Consider also the context of the question as you determine how to answer. Sometimes answering a question with a question can be helpful because it promotes understanding by both parent and child, especially of underlying assumptions and arguments.

Preserve your credibility by stating the truth that you do know and avoid speculation beyond the facts. Be willing to say “I don’t know,” but then go and study to find the answers. Also beware of some arguments against evolution that we make in error and be careful to present evolutionary arguments properly and not as caricatures. Parents do not have to understand evolutionary ideas entirely, but neither should we make evolutionists say what they do not say.

Our children should acquire an understanding of evolutionary ideas, particularly as it contrasts with a biblical creation viewpoint.

Each opposing viewpoint carries its own assumptions, affirmations, and implications, so parents should help children realize that real-world evidence will be interpreted according to these biases.8 It is not sufficient to simply look at the evidence since all evidence is interpreted according to the observer’s starting point. For example, the NPR article suggests the following activity for you and your children:

On a starry night, we may take our child outdoors, point out the Big Dipper, and talk a little bit about the long, long time it takes for the light of distant stars to reach our eyes.9

This narrative presupposes that distant starlight takes millions and even billions of years before we can see it on Earth. The child would likely conclude that the universe is unquestionably older than the Bible suggests. But these vast astronomical distances are a problem in an evolutionary viewpoint as well. An alternative commentary—presupposing the truth of God’s Word—during this suggested stargazing event could flow this way:

Wow! Look at these beautiful stars that God made for us to enjoy. The Bible says that God made the stars at the same time as our sun and moon, on Day Four of the Creation Week. Some of these stars are millions of light-years away. But remember that a light-year is a measure of distance, not time. We are not sure how light can travel such great distances even over billions of years, but scientists who start with God’s Word have developed several ideas to explain how starlight could have traveled here in a short amount of time.

In short, parents should not be intimidated by “the science of evolution” or its proponents. As the Proverbs say, “"The fear of man brings a snare, but whoever trusts in the Lord shall be safe"” (Proverbs 29:25). Adherence to God’s Word does not require blind faith as belief in evolution does. The God of the Bible is faithful and His Word is sure. We should make every effort to encourage our children to fear the Lord and greatly delight in His commandments (Psalm 112:1).""  

[StarlightAngel85]

First of all, I want to say (to be fair), I haven't had a chance to read your *whole* first post (yet... it's on my 'to do' list). It was very long and I wanted to get my thoughts down on "paper" (as it were) while they were still fresh in my mind. So... if I repeat a point that was already made, I do apologize in advance. However, here are my thoughts on "teaching about evolution."

To ME, whether or not Evolution is a real thing, depends on what you are referring to as "evolution." If what we call "evolution" is actually "Natural Selection," then yes, Evolution is real and it is something our kids should know about. Natural Selection is determined by which creatures with which specific traits end up breeding. That is how, for example, we wound up with so many different breeds of cats and dogs. They all started out as wolves, but through natural selection (maybe not quite so natural since humans interfered with it), dogs "evolved" into all the different breeds you see today.

We cannot deny that THIS type of evolution is true and real.

However, what has *not* been proven (and I am going to say, WON'T be, because it isn't a real thing) is the type of evolution that says, "A monkey turns into a human." This is why the THEORY of Evolution (however well accepted it might be) is still referred to as a THEORY of Evolution and not a LAW of evolution... because it has not been proven by science. If a creature starts out as a monkey, it may evolve to look different over time... but it will STILL be a monkey... not a human.

So, in answer to the original question, this is what I will teach my children. As to *when* I would teach it to them, that would depend on when they seemed old enough to understand this teaching. I 'want' my kids to learn about science. I don't think science and religion have to be mutually exclusive. I have faith, of course, and faith does not require proof. But, that does not mean man is not a curious being (to our downfall at times...). And, science can be so much fun when you think, "Wow. Look what God did here!" mrgreen  

[Lady Vizsla]

StarlightAngel85

First of all, I want to say (to be fair), I haven't had a chance to read your *whole* first post (yet... it's on my 'to do' list). It was very long and I wanted to get my thoughts down on "paper" (as it were) while they were still fresh in my mind. So... if I repeat a point that was already made, I do apologize in advance. However, here are my thoughts on "teaching about evolution."

To ME, whether or not Evolution is a real thing, depends on what you are referring to as "evolution." If what we call "evolution" is actually "Natural Selection," then yes, Evolution is real and it is something our kids should know about. Natural Selection is determined by which creatures with which specific traits end up breeding. That is how, for example, we wound up with so many different breeds of cats and dogs. They all started out as wolves, but through natural selection (maybe not quite so natural since humans interfered with it), dogs "evolved" into all the different breeds you see today.

We cannot deny that THIS type of evolution is true and real.

However, what has *not* been proven (and I am going to say, WON'T be, because it isn't a real thing) is the type of evolution that says, "A monkey turns into a human." This is why the THEORY of Evolution (however well accepted it might be) is still referred to as a THEORY of Evolution and not a LAW of evolution... because it has not been proven by science. If a creature starts out as a monkey, it may evolve to look different over time... but it will STILL be a monkey... not a human.

So, in answer to the original question, this is what I will teach my children. As to *when* I would teach it to them, that would depend on when they seemed old enough to understand this teaching. I 'want' my kids to learn about science. I don't think science and religion have to be mutually exclusive. I have faith, of course, and faith does not require proof. But, that does not mean man is not a curious being (to our downfall at times...). And, science can be so much fun when you think, "Wow. Look what God did here!" mrgreen

I agree with you 100%. Sometimes when people ask, 'do you believe in evolution?' you have to pause and wonder if they mean adaptation and natural selection or if they mean all types of creatures are related. Like I'd tell someone that natural selection eliminates variety, it does not increase it. I certainly don't think natural selection could turn a land animal into a whale for instance, gradually. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!