|
|
Literacy: |
Stodgy |
|
9% |
[ 5 ] |
Good Stuff |
|
85% |
[ 47 ] |
Poll 'ho' |
|
5% |
[ 3 ] |
|
Total Votes : 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:55 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:26 pm
|
|
|
|
Actually, I'm quite the chatter, if I do say so myself. Honestly, I've never stopped to spell "a lot" as one word, or fallen to many of the lingual grievances spoken of in here. Of course, each community I frequent has its own lexicon, and I am known to adapt and use certain phrases from those areas. An interesting note on that, however, is that most of these words do not involve using fewer letters than the "proper" spelling, and generally deal with a simple mixing-of-letters or substitution.
A few simple rules that I try to suggest to any and all who insist on speaking with me on a fairly frequent basis would be: 1. You're and your. If you're (you are!) not going to use them right, that's your problem. 2. Their, they're, and there: If it's not here, it's there. If they're (they are!) playing with it, it's theirs. 3. A lot. There's no such word as "Alittle", though "allot" is a word, it refers to rations. 4. I. If you capitalize nothing else, at least capitalize the pronoun "I." 5. Then and than. <,>, are both use than. Then refers to time. Time doesn't have an "a" in it, so neither does the word that correlates to it. 6. Accept and except. It is not acceptable to make exceptions for poor grammar on a thread. There is an edit button, and you can make full use of it. (accept is generally pronounced as "ak-sept" while "except" should be pronounced as "ik-sept." Sound out your words, because an 'i' sound is never made by the letter 'a.')
I find these are good rules to follow anywhere, and people who can't take the time to educate themselves on these words (they were 4th grade words when I learned them, but my niece just started 3rd grade, is 8-years-old, and ALREADY knows them and their differences) then you shouldn't attempt to affect a higher stance than others who are more willing to learn than you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:10 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:49 pm
|
|
|
|
TheHellDevil I'm going to have to somewhat disagree here.... Well, I mean that the literacy here doesn't surprise me. But the opinion that literacy is a sort of virtue is a bit hard for me to swallow. I guess it's because of how English and other languages have evolved over centuries. I have a hard time believing that the language we're using and calling "literacy" is really the "right" way to write and speak, seeing the history of language and actually experiencing its evolution in the form of internet leetspeak, ebonics, etc. Regardless, I'm going to have to admit that I prefer reading and writing in the language that everyone here agrees is "literacy". It's just easier for me to understand a language in which I'm already fluent instead of learning a new ones, obviously. I can still type fairly quickly in alternate caps and leetspeak though. Sometimes, they're a good way of lightening a stuffy situation in chats. P.S. Notice how I wrote "a language in which I'm already fluent"? I'm sure a lot of you guys usually say "a language I'm already fluent in" instead, especially if you're speaking instead of writing. Isn't that part of the evolution? I completely understand what you mean by the evolution of language.... We don't speak today like we did even 100 years ago, but these changes that happen to speech are subtle and take time. The issue is, I think, the fact that you have in one or two short decades (or however the hell long it's been) that have spawned a subculture of... well... linguistic idiocy. I can understand abbreviations and such in text messages and the like, but other than that, there really is no reason to not put up the effort to spell things out or use decent grammar. Yes, spelling and grammar mistakes happen, but too often the sorts of things I see are violations of the most basic rules of the language, things that any grade school child should know better than to do.
More to the point, there's a vast difference between putting a preposition at the end of a sentence and typing down a string of near-incomprehensible letters and numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:12 am
|
|
|
|
Since everyone else is quoting you, I guess I might as well join in on the fun.
TheHellDevil I'm going to have to somewhat disagree here.... Well, I mean that the literacy here doesn't surprise me. But the opinion that literacy is a sort of virtue is a bit hard for me to swallow. I can understand why literacy being a virtue is a hard pill to take, but keep in mind that most of the mistakes seen in boards are things known to most fourth graders--that is, if they paid any attention whilst in school.
TheHellDevil I guess it's because of how English and other languages have evolved over centuries. I have a hard time believing that the language we're using and calling "literacy" is really the "right" way to write and speak, seeing the history of language and actually experiencing its evolution in the form of internet leetspeak, ebonics, etc. I have to point to Seanne here, for her apt response to this statement. Might I add, though, that the underlined word above is not in its proper form? You should use "literate" instead.
TheHellDevil Regardless, I'm going to have to admit that I prefer reading and writing in the language that everyone here agrees is "literacy". It's just easier for me to understand a language in which I'm already fluent instead of learning a new ones, obviously. I can still type fairly quickly in alternate caps and leetspeak though. Sometimes, they're a good way of lightening a stuffy situation in chats. Again with the literacy/literate mix-up. Blah blah blah.. Language in which.. blah blah blah.. instead of learning a new ones... Wait, what? A new ones? ... The new ones? A new one? Hmm... an ambiguous statement, for where does the true typo lie? Well, back to reading. Typing quick in alternating caps and leetspeak. Not exactly things I'd be proud of, but then again, I recognized leetspeak for the idiocy it was when it first reared its ugly head. Yeah, I'm that old.
TheHellDevil P.S. Notice how I wrote "a language in which I'm already fluent"? I'm sure a lot of you guys usually say "a language I'm already fluent in" instead, especially if you're speaking instead of writing. Isn't that part of the evolution? I prefer to say, "I'm fairly fluent in [that language]," in which case, I may say either English, American Sign Language, or Spanish. I'm still learning German, Russian, French, Italian, and Japanese, so I claim no mastery or even base skill in speaking these latter languages, although I'm developing a fairly good Japanese accent. It is nice to see that you aren't ending sentences with prepositions, but what good is that grammar rule if you forget so many others?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 12:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:15 am
|
|
|
|
Kyreie What is n00bspeak, and l33tsp34k?
n00bspeak and l33tsp34k ARE (not IS):
newb-speak, the modern version of l33tsp34k.
l33tsp34k, a wannabe-cool way to type out "elite-speak," which is to say, in the late 80s and early 90s, it was considered the cool way to communicate through text.
They're the early versions of chatspeak and "txt." Both are bloody well annoying.
pretty hate machine While I do think being literate is important, I also try to keep in mind that not all people who own a computer and can use the internet have a degree in English. For some, English may be their second, third or even fourth language, and for some people it's a difficult language to grasp.
Right. For the sake of the ESL community (that's English as a Second Language), shouldn't the native speakers try to be as clear as possible, so as not to obfuscate their intentions and meanings? If someone has to consult a dictionary when reading what you write, at least write in the clearest way possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|