|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 3:52 pm
 |
|
|
|
Xallus vampirewarrier i don't beleive any one thing could make all the universe, and sertainly not one man, if one thing did create everything it'd be a goddess, not a god.
It all makes sense if you think about it, because I don't know any guy who'd be tempted to eat a ******** apple when some almighty god watched over him. Now if it was the forbidden tree of heavenly bacon....
NO NO NO! God is NOT a girl! God is a GUY! Yes, He created the first man Adam, and created the first woman by removing one of Adam's ribs to create Eve. NO there was NO mention of what kind of fruit the tree of knowledge of good and evil had in the Bible! Man created the concept of diets, NOT the devil! Satan took the form of a serpent in the Garden of Eden and TEMPTED Eve to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil saying that if they did they'd be just like God. So she did, then convinced Adam to do the same, which he did also! (Genesis 2:21 & Genesis 3:1-6) |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:56 pm
|
|
|
 |
Princess Zelda21 Xallus vampirewarrier i don't beleive any one thing could make all the universe, and sertainly not one man, if one thing did create everything it'd be a goddess, not a god.
It all makes sense if you think about it, because I don't know any guy who'd be tempted to eat a ******** apple when some almighty god watched over him. Now if it was the forbidden tree of heavenly bacon....
I hope you are being sarcastic and facetious. Because this all should belong in a fairytale book. I mean, what kind of rambling is this about a serpent that tempts people into eating a fruit that will condemn them for the rest of eternity and is called 'sin' ..although the tree was present in the garden created by the Hebrew god. Analysing this ficticious text, one can deduce that the Hebrew god was indeed aware that man and woman would eventually eat of the fruit. He had already planned this...as he was allegedly omniscient.
....
But of course I am not saying any of this is remotely possible. No garden of Eden, no rib-woman, no talking serpent(as serpents do not possess the ability to speak). The story itself appears to be the effect of a drug-induced dream and hallucination. No one was around to verify these occurrences. So can we say they are significant?
---Can we say that this first text of the Bible as we know it now..(.because there have been versions before it. We just got the sparknotes version of it after much bowdlerizing and editing and deleting of things that the authorities did not want included) is the word of any god? Seeing as it openly accepts and even condones genocide,slavery, misogyny and mass murder.
So no...this is no proof of any intelligent mind or entity or overseer. This is the work of a psychopath. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:32 am
|
|
|
|
XxLeComtesseAndrogynexX Princess Zelda21 Xallus vampirewarrier i don't beleive any one thing could make all the universe, and sertainly not one man, if one thing did create everything it'd be a goddess, not a god.
It all makes sense if you think about it, because I don't know any guy who'd be tempted to eat a ******** apple when some almighty god watched over him. Now if it was the forbidden tree of heavenly bacon....I hope you are being sarcastic and facetious. Because this all should belong in a fairytale book. I mean, what kind of rambling is this about a serpent that tempts people into eating a fruit that will condemn them for the rest of eternity and is called 'sin' ..although the tree was present in the garden created by the Hebrew god. Analysing this ficticious text, one can deduce that the Hebrew god was indeed aware that man and woman would eventually eat of the fruit. He had already planned this...as he was allegedly omniscient. .... But of course I am not saying any of this is remotely possible. No garden of Eden, no rib-woman, no talking serpent(as serpents do not possess the ability to speak). The story itself appears to be the effect of a drug-induced dream and hallucination. No one was around to verify these occurrences. So can we say they are significant? ---Can we say that this first text of the Bible as we know it now..(.because there have been versions before it. We just got the sparknotes version of it after much bowdlerizing and editing and deleting of things that the authorities did not want included) is the word of any god? Seeing as it openly accepts and even condones genocide,slavery, misogyny and mass murder. So no...this is no proof of any intelligent mind or entity or overseer. This is the work of a psychopath.
Excuse me? psychopath? NO! I don't think so! I'm NOT rambling, it's THE TRUTH! I just gave you proof, it's NOT fiction, it's REAL HISTORY! You just don't see it because it's right in front of your nose! HELLO? What part don't you get? -_-* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
Princess Zelda21 XxLeComtesseAndrogynexX Princess Zelda21 Xallus vampirewarrier i don't beleive any one thing could make all the universe, and sertainly not one man, if one thing did create everything it'd be a goddess, not a god.
It all makes sense if you think about it, because I don't know any guy who'd be tempted to eat a ******** apple when some almighty god watched over him. Now if it was the forbidden tree of heavenly bacon....I hope you are being sarcastic and facetious. Because this all should belong in a fairytale book. I mean, what kind of rambling is this about a serpent that tempts people into eating a fruit that will condemn them for the rest of eternity and is called 'sin' ..although the tree was present in the garden created by the Hebrew god. Analysing this ficticious text, one can deduce that the Hebrew god was indeed aware that man and woman would eventually eat of the fruit. He had already planned this...as he was allegedly omniscient. .... But of course I am not saying any of this is remotely possible. No garden of Eden, no rib-woman, no talking serpent(as serpents do not possess the ability to speak). The story itself appears to be the effect of a drug-induced dream and hallucination. No one was around to verify these occurrences. So can we say they are significant? ---Can we say that this first text of the Bible as we know it now..(.because there have been versions before it. We just got the sparknotes version of it after much bowdlerizing and editing and deleting of things that the authorities did not want included) is the word of any god? Seeing as it openly accepts and even condones genocide,slavery, misogyny and mass murder. So no...this is no proof of any intelligent mind or entity or overseer. This is the work of a psychopath.
Edit: By facts, I mean s**t that's not quoted from your man-made Bible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 2:52 pm
|
|
|
|
Xallus Princess Zelda21 XxLeComtesseAndrogynexX Princess Zelda21 Xallus vampirewarrier i don't beleive any one thing could make all the universe, and sertainly not one man, if one thing did create everything it'd be a goddess, not a god.
It all makes sense if you think about it, because I don't know any guy who'd be tempted to eat a ******** apple when some almighty god watched over him. Now if it was the forbidden tree of heavenly bacon....I hope you are being sarcastic and facetious. Because this all should belong in a fairytale book. I mean, what kind of rambling is this about a serpent that tempts people into eating a fruit that will condemn them for the rest of eternity and is called 'sin' ..although the tree was present in the garden created by the Hebrew god. Analysing this ficticious text, one can deduce that the Hebrew god was indeed aware that man and woman would eventually eat of the fruit. He had already planned this...as he was allegedly omniscient. .... But of course I am not saying any of this is remotely possible. No garden of Eden, no rib-woman, no talking serpent(as serpents do not possess the ability to speak). The story itself appears to be the effect of a drug-induced dream and hallucination. No one was around to verify these occurrences. So can we say they are significant? ---Can we say that this first text of the Bible as we know it now..(.because there have been versions before it. We just got the sparknotes version of it after much bowdlerizing and editing and deleting of things that the authorities did not want included) is the word of any god? Seeing as it openly accepts and even condones genocide,slavery, misogyny and mass murder. So no...this is no proof of any intelligent mind or entity or overseer. This is the work of a psychopath.
May I interject?
I didn't read all of this conversation but here is what I have to say
1) God is neither girl nor guy so both of your concepts about gender is
wrong.
2) Dieting was not created from Satan but was developed from Satan putting ideas into people's heads about weight.
3) All of the bible's teachings are not true. It was indeed man made and PLUS some versus and books were burned or lost.
I am a christian but I believe in GOD's word. Not some collections of books that may or may not be true. Some of the bible's teachings are true though.
Plus I'm gay. ;3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:17 pm
|
|
|
|
Xallus Nico_Ryan May I interject? I didn't read all of this conversation but here is what I have to say 1) God is neither girl nor guy so both of your concepts about gender is
wrong.
2) Dieting was not created from Satan but was developed from Satan putting ideas into people's heads about weight.
3) All of the bible's teachings are not true. It was indeed man made and PLUS some versus and books were burned or lost.
I am a christian but I believe in GOD's word. Not some collections of books that may or may not be true. Some of the bible's teachings are true though. Plus I'm gay. ;3
God is talked about as omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent. I know that God wouldn't have a gender if these teachings are true, and "He" is used more as reverence than a referent to gender. Then again, if God created man in "his" image, then wouldn't he be considered a man by definition? jk ;P
Dieting was created by a talking snake/wasn't-really-a-snake fallen angel named Lucifer. It was the punishment given to women for eating a fruit.
I'm well aware about this.
I'm agnostic, and I see the Bible as nothing more than a fictitious book that still has it's uses. While I don't believe in any of the stories in it, I don't see anything wrong with using that tool as a way to teach others morality and whatnot.
What does your sexuality have to do with this? =o
Quite interesting
I have nothing else to say but that I see your points.
I'm trying to be "Loud and Proud" for the first time. lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:08 pm
|
|
|
|
Princess Zelda21 *facepalm, smh* You guys are so seriously lost.... -_-*
GatoK1509 This may well be a bit of trollery with how redonkulous it is, but oh well, here's my viewpoint: Chuck Norris sneezed (the big bang). From there we evolved from whatever it was that made him sneeze. Voila, bullshit! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:56 am
|
|
|
|
Xallus Princess Zelda21 XxLeComtesseAndrogynexX Princess Zelda21 Xallus vampirewarrier i don't beleive any one thing could make all the universe, and sertainly not one man, if one thing did create everything it'd be a goddess, not a god.
It all makes sense if you think about it, because I don't know any guy who'd be tempted to eat a ******** apple when some almighty god watched over him. Now if it was the forbidden tree of heavenly bacon....I hope you are being sarcastic and facetious. Because this all should belong in a fairytale book. I mean, what kind of rambling is this about a serpent that tempts people into eating a fruit that will condemn them for the rest of eternity and is called 'sin' ..although the tree was present in the garden created by the Hebrew god. Analysing this fictitious text, one can deduce that the Hebrew god was indeed aware that man and woman would eventually eat of the fruit. He had already planned this...as he was allegedly omniscient. .... But of course I am not saying any of this is remotely possible. No garden of Eden, no rib-woman, no talking serpent(as serpents do not possess the ability to speak). The story itself appears to be the effect of a drug-induced dream and hallucination. No one was around to verify these occurrences. So can we say they are significant? ---Can we say that this first text of the Bible as we know it now..(.because there have been versions before it. We just got the sparknotes version of it after much bowdlerizing and editing and deleting of things that the authorities did not want included) is the word of any god? Seeing as it openly accepts and even condones genocide,slavery, misogyny and mass murder. So no...this is no proof of any intelligent mind or entity or overseer. This is the work of a psychopath.
Edit: By facts, I mean s**t that's not quoted from your man-made Bible.
'God' could be Abraxas...which btw, is a very interesting deity. If deities were real.
God is a 12 year old boy with asperger's syndrome.
And yes...a psychopath. Male or female..or neither. A sadomasochist.
@Princess Zelda: Bit of a rash judgment, dontchathink. You are just as lost as we are. Unless,of course,you hold the keys to all knowledge in the known universe.
-And I don't get any part of your argument.
It's your truth,not mine.
And it's not in front of my nose...it's too abstract and bizarre a concept to grasp or even proof and follow. It's too easy and simple to believe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:55 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
