One of the things that has bothered me for a long time is that there is very little uniformity across all the colorists in terms of what kinds of edits are allowed and what kind of edits are not. I've seen several instances of people being told no to certain edits, yet within a month or two the very thing they were denied is being allowed with another person. It really isn't fair and gives the impression of favoritism, even if that's not the case.
I think part of the problem is that colorists are not being told what is allowed, point-blank, and when they need to ask if the line is fuzzy. I also think that people are getting very creative with finding ways to 'cheat', meaning that the illusion of the illegal edit is there , but it's not genetically there, so it hasn't really broken the rule (I hope that makes sense). However, the go-around is so seamless that intense confusion results; people think that the edit is now allowable.
::A few instances I have witnessed::
==Hippogriffs being denied at first, then the WoW event allowed soquili in that had beak 'masks', yet it was not clear that these were masks ONLY. People denied hippogriffs then become angry. THEN, another hippogriff soquili comes out and that one looks 100% genetic, not masked.
==Issues with pelts and what is/isn't allowed on non-skinwalker soquili vs. true skinwalkers. It gets to the point where it's very hard to distinguish what actually is or isn't a skinwalker. I believe there was an instance of a non-skinwalker breeding that the colorist thought WAS a skinwalker. It resulted in the colorist having to redo the soquili from the breeding.
Clarification:
Kamiki
RE: the skinwalker/non skinwalker breeding.
Since this was my breeding here's what I understood happened.
There were rules set that there was a SMALL CHANCE that a purewalker x not a purewalker could produce purewalker foals.
So Kumiho (purewalker) bred with Cerb (pawed mutant) and the colorist made 2 of the babies purewalkers because no set percentage was set.
But someone (or someones) went ballistic that "HOMG PUREWALKERS HAVE TO BE SO RARE!?" that they made the colorist redo them.
Now, I like pawed mutants just as much as skinwalkers, but this kind of leads back to my thread I made on the extreme crazy rarity of purewalkers.
........... I guess I just wanted to clarify what I understood happened there because I always felt so damn bad the colorist had to redo 2 of the foals from scratch over a misunderstanding and over-reaction.
SO YES...
I do think there are things that are kind of off kilter about what's allowed and isn't allowed.
Since this was my breeding here's what I understood happened.
There were rules set that there was a SMALL CHANCE that a purewalker x not a purewalker could produce purewalker foals.
So Kumiho (purewalker) bred with Cerb (pawed mutant) and the colorist made 2 of the babies purewalkers because no set percentage was set.
But someone (or someones) went ballistic that "HOMG PUREWALKERS HAVE TO BE SO RARE!?" that they made the colorist redo them.
Now, I like pawed mutants just as much as skinwalkers, but this kind of leads back to my thread I made on the extreme crazy rarity of purewalkers.
........... I guess I just wanted to clarify what I understood happened there because I always felt so damn bad the colorist had to redo 2 of the foals from scratch over a misunderstanding and over-reaction.
SO YES...
I do think there are things that are kind of off kilter about what's allowed and isn't allowed.
==Soquili so edited, you can hardly tell there's a horse under there.
==The rules regarding mutants completely blow my mind. I've been with this shop for years and I still don't entirely get it. I see things that have body changes that don't get labeled as mutants...yet from the rules, they should be? Please clarify and stick to it!
: razz roposed Solutions::
I think that colorists need to be expressly told what is and isn't allowed and a list of such things might need to be posted in the colorist forums if it hasn't already for a reference. Freedom for colorists is great and all, but there really needs to be a defined line of either Yes! or No! in terms of what is allowable. Colorists need to be held to this and if they don't follow it, then they need to be reprimanded and fix the problem. I don't want to create more work for anyone, but if there's anyway someone can okay projects and stuff before they are released, that might help.
In terms of the buyers, they NEED to stop trying to cross the line. I know the shop is huge, but there has to be some way to get people to agree to certain rules and abide by them. I think if the rules are cleaned up and cut down, that might help. Less reading = higher likelyhood it actually gets read.