|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:34 pm
 |
|
|
 |
For those who don't know, Lolita is a type of J-Fashion (Japanese Fashion). In recent years, it's popularity has grown. There is some dispute on where the name comes from. See, Lolita style has nothing to do with the book Lolita. The best way to describe the style is to think of porcelain dolls, innocence.
I'm curious what type of Lolita style everyone is into? There is so many different styles and its interesting to see what is popular.
Personally, I like Qi, Cyber, Steampunk, and Gothic. I do branch out to Sweet and Punk once in awhile. I also like how Kodona and Guro looks, but I never got around to making one.
For those who would like to find out about the different styles, here are some links:
Wikipedia
LolitaFashion.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:31 pm
|
|
|
|
TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart i'm not really into lolita (though i might draw something like it), but i seem to make some lolita-style avis... here's a link to a thread about it That thread has some good information, but some misleading info as well. I would suggest this website for a better definition and info. Lolita Fashion
it's a start |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart i'm not really into lolita (though i might draw something like it), but i seem to make some lolita-style avis... here's a link to a thread about it That thread has some good information, but some misleading info as well. I would suggest this website for a better definition and info. Lolita Fashionit's a start
I would rather people get their starts with more reliable information. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart i'm not really into lolita (though i might draw something like it), but i seem to make some lolita-style avis... here's a link to a thread about it That thread has some good information, but some misleading info as well. I would suggest this website for a better definition and info. Lolita Fashionit's a start I would rather people get their starts with more reliable information.
/pulls a teacher, including grouchy-mocking voice
then don't use Wikipedia, that can be edited by anyone and is unreliable and nag nag nag nag nag
...
sorry.
it's got pics of it, are those at least somewhat accurate to their labels? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:46 pm
|
|
|
|
Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart i'm not really into lolita (though i might draw something like it), but i seem to make some lolita-style avis... here's a link to a thread about it That thread has some good information, but some misleading info as well. I would suggest this website for a better definition and info. Lolita Fashionit's a start I would rather people get their starts with more reliable information. /pulls a teacher, including grouchy-mocking voice
then don't use Wikipedia, that can be edited by anyone and is unreliable and nag nag nag nag nag
...
sorry.
it's got pics of it, are those at least somewhat accurate to their labels?
Why are you getting so mad about this?
Also, I don't use wikipedia for my information? And the link I posted wasn't from wikipedia. It it a website for lolitas that talks about lolita fashion in detail and gives a better overview than that thread. It also lacks the misleading and wrong information and gives more accurate descriptions. It also has better example pictures.
I'm really confused as to where that came from, and it was rather rude. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:54 pm
|
|
|
|
TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart i'm not really into lolita (though i might draw something like it), but i seem to make some lolita-style avis... here's a link to a thread about it That thread has some good information, but some misleading info as well. I would suggest this website for a better definition and info. Lolita Fashionit's a start I would rather people get their starts with more reliable information. /pulls a teacher, including grouchy-mocking voice
then don't use Wikipedia, that can be edited by anyone and is unreliable and nag nag nag nag nag
...
sorry.
it's got pics of it, are those at least somewhat accurate to their labels? Why are you getting so mad about this? Also, I don't use wikipedia for my information? And the link I posted wasn't from wikipedia. It it a website for lolitas that talks about lolita fashion in detail and gives a better overview than that thread. It also lacks the misleading and wrong information and gives more accurate descriptions. It also has better example pictures. I'm really confused as to where that came from, and it was rather rude.
what, have you never heard teachers rant about Wikipedia? i was joking, hence the sorry in the same post.
*siiiiiiighhhhhh* no one understands my sense of humor... cat_emo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:56 pm
|
|
|
|
Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh I would rather people get their starts with more reliable information. /pulls a teacher, including grouchy-mocking voice
then don't use Wikipedia, that can be edited by anyone and is unreliable and nag nag nag nag nag
...
sorry.
it's got pics of it, are those at least somewhat accurate to their labels? Why are you getting so mad about this? Also, I don't use wikipedia for my information? And the link I posted wasn't from wikipedia. It it a website for lolitas that talks about lolita fashion in detail and gives a better overview than that thread. It also lacks the misleading and wrong information and gives more accurate descriptions. It also has better example pictures. I'm really confused as to where that came from, and it was rather rude. what, have you never heard teachers rant about Wikipedia? i was joking, hence the sorry in the same post.
*siiiiiiighhhhhh* no one understands my sense of humor... cat_emo
Humor is funny. Besides, I'd consider wikipedia more reliable than a forum post made by one person. *shrug* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:01 pm
|
|
|
|
TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh I would rather people get their starts with more reliable information. /pulls a teacher, including grouchy-mocking voice
then don't use Wikipedia, that can be edited by anyone and is unreliable and nag nag nag nag nag
...
sorry.
it's got pics of it, are those at least somewhat accurate to their labels? Why are you getting so mad about this? Also, I don't use wikipedia for my information? And the link I posted wasn't from wikipedia. It it a website for lolitas that talks about lolita fashion in detail and gives a better overview than that thread. It also lacks the misleading and wrong information and gives more accurate descriptions. It also has better example pictures. I'm really confused as to where that came from, and it was rather rude. what, have you never heard teachers rant about Wikipedia? i was joking, hence the sorry in the same post.
*siiiiiiighhhhhh* no one understands my sense of humor... cat_emo Humor is funny. Besides, I'd consider wikipedia more reliable than a forum post made by one person. *shrug*
humor is different for each and every person. i inherited my dad's sense of humor, which most people don't understand. so i might find it funny, and it'll go over the head of others, or they think it's an insult or some such. :shrug: nothing i can do about that
however, the internet on the fritz is no laughing matter. that means my mom is online, playing stupid Facebook games emotion_facepalm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:07 pm
|
|
|
|
Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart /pulls a teacher, including grouchy-mocking voice
then don't use Wikipedia, that can be edited by anyone and is unreliable and nag nag nag nag nag
...
sorry.
it's got pics of it, are those at least somewhat accurate to their labels? Why are you getting so mad about this? Also, I don't use wikipedia for my information? And the link I posted wasn't from wikipedia. It it a website for lolitas that talks about lolita fashion in detail and gives a better overview than that thread. It also lacks the misleading and wrong information and gives more accurate descriptions. It also has better example pictures. I'm really confused as to where that came from, and it was rather rude. what, have you never heard teachers rant about Wikipedia? i was joking, hence the sorry in the same post.
*siiiiiiighhhhhh* no one understands my sense of humor... cat_emo Humor is funny. Besides, I'd consider wikipedia more reliable than a forum post made by one person. *shrug* humor is different for each and every person. i inherited my dad's sense of humor, which most people don't understand. so i might find it funny, and it'll go over the head of others, or they think it's an insult or some such. :shrug: nothing i can do about that
however, the internet on the fritz is no laughing matter. that means my mom is online, playing stupid Facebook games emotion_facepalm
I hope you don't think that, when someone doesn't think you're funny, it has "gone over their head." I have a friend who inherited her dad's sense of humor; it involves insults and ridiculous and loud mentally handicapped people. It isn't funny, but when we don't laugh she (and her father) say we are too dumb to understand it. Honestly, your "humor" did come as an attack: You presented my source as if it had no value in order to elevate your own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:10 pm
|
|
|
|
TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart TheAnneh Kitalpha Hart /pulls a teacher, including grouchy-mocking voice
then don't use Wikipedia, that can be edited by anyone and is unreliable and nag nag nag nag nag
...
sorry.
it's got pics of it, are those at least somewhat accurate to their labels? Why are you getting so mad about this? Also, I don't use wikipedia for my information? And the link I posted wasn't from wikipedia. It it a website for lolitas that talks about lolita fashion in detail and gives a better overview than that thread. It also lacks the misleading and wrong information and gives more accurate descriptions. It also has better example pictures. I'm really confused as to where that came from, and it was rather rude. what, have you never heard teachers rant about Wikipedia? i was joking, hence the sorry in the same post.
*siiiiiiighhhhhh* no one understands my sense of humor... cat_emo Humor is funny. Besides, I'd consider wikipedia more reliable than a forum post made by one person. *shrug* humor is different for each and every person. i inherited my dad's sense of humor, which most people don't understand. so i might find it funny, and it'll go over the head of others, or they think it's an insult or some such. :shrug: nothing i can do about that
however, the internet on the fritz is no laughing matter. that means my mom is online, playing stupid Facebook games emotion_facepalm I hope you don't think that, when someone doesn't think you're funny, it has "gone over their head." I have a friend who inherited her dad's sense of humor; it involves insults and ridiculous and loud mentally handicapped people. It isn't funny, but when we don't laugh she (and her father) say we are too dumb to understand it. Honestly, your "humor" did come as an attack: You presented my source as if it had no value in order to elevate your own.
...if that's how you see it, then. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
