|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 5:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2013 6:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:35 am
|
|
|
|
Jewelies I've actually not heard of the movie until just now...but yikes. .__. Yeah, definitely will be staying far, far away from this movie. Thanks for the heads up!
There's a big difference between taking a few liberties with a Bible story and totally and completely changing the whole thing to the point you might as well re-name the characters and call it something else entirely. ._.
Take The Prince of Egypt, for example. The movie even says before it starts that it may not be an exact representation of the real story, but I still feel it was a good Christian movie that I got a lot out of. Was it a perfect re-telling of the story of Moses? No, but it does introduce people to the story of Moses, as well as having a lot of good points to make and things to learn about. Also the way they put the notice at the beginning of the movie, to me, tells people to go and read the actual story and not just watch the movie.
What they're doing with that Noah movie...just...wow. That's just wrong. : /
I know what you mean about the whole "The Prince of Egypt" thing. It wasn't 100% Biblical, but it did have excellent points that were Biblical and did introduce people to the story a bit more. After that movie, I always like to read back in Exodus to determine what was Biblical and what was not and I learn something new each time.
But yes, there is a thing about changing a few details here and there between Biblical and non-Biblical and then going off the deep end gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|