|
|
Do you think we should be able to list more than 5 couples? |
Yes |
|
41% |
[ 26 ] |
No |
|
43% |
[ 27 ] |
Never given it much thought |
|
14% |
[ 9 ] |
|
Total Votes : 62 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 8:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 9:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 10:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 12:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 3:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 3:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 5:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 8:01 pm
|
|
|
|
I'm one of the No votes, and part of that is because I think having no limit might cause the MCCL to get even LESS use than it already does.
As it is, assuming every person with a post in the MCCL has five couples in their post, that makes a whopping 75 couples per page. The likelihood of that happening isn't exactly stellar, since some pages have deleted posts and it's not exactly a given everyone has five couples, but the possibility of it happening is still out there.
At some point, fishing through all those couples is going to become more of a strain on the colorists than just doing a good old-fashioned breeding raffle. Colorists may not want to pull up the MCCL at all, because if they do they have to wait for everything to load and then once it has, there is a ridiculous amount of scrolling to do to find even one or two pairs they might like to color kids for.
Five couples per person is fairly generous, and even if you don't want to host your forms in your teepee, it isn't that difficult to find other places for them. Before hosting mine in my teepee, I kept them in notepad documents on my laptop. In another shop, I keep all my breeding forms in a thread in my personal guild. For a request thread, I have a thread in the test forum that I keep some profiles in.
All of these are easy options available, and some of them are still easily accessible if you're on mobile!
In addition, there are people in the B/C who still have slow connections due to where they live. I have a close friend who lives out in the middle of nowhere and has a monthly bandwidth limit. While her internet speed isn't exactly bad, the bandwidth limit means loading pages with lots of images can eat through what she has available, and could render her without internet for a few days if she goes over. :T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 9:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 9:23 pm
|
|
|
|
Honestly, I'm on my cell phone most of the time. If I had to scroll through ten posts with 20+ couples, or my phone had to even load those posts? Lolnope. I'd end up being one of the unfortunate people who wouldn't update their post and would get deleted.
Also, there definitely are people who have 20+ couples, and people who don't. I'm not saying that having more couples necessarily makes you more likely to get CCed, but it means you have more variety and more to choose from. So in a way, the numbers game comes in with fairness. If I entered all 23 of my couples, including flings, it may seem a little discouraging to the person who only has one couple to enter.
Even if they did change the rule, I don't think I'd go over five. I feel like your MCCL is for couples you have on the top of your priority list, or at least that's how I use it. If I entered all of my couples it'd be like just desperately groping for ANY breeding I can get, even of it isn't one that has been waiting for a while/trying in raffles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 9:48 pm
|
|
|
|
It's already a pretty hefty number of images per page, honestly. 8'D That's a lot to take in, not even counting on internet usage--it's just kinda visually overloading, y'know? Plus, having to wade through even more couples than are currently there would be...sort of a cluster, really. :c Honestly, it'd be hard for me to actually go through it if there were more than the five right now. And...really, five's kinda. plenty. Entering a whole bunch of them at once doesn't do anything for your chances, it just. makes it harder to go through the list, imo. The current number is a pretty solid amount in terms of feasibility, and it's also just easier on folks who're doing things on mobiles like how I do sometimes. I can barely load the MCCL on that thing as it is. 8'>
that and there's visual fatigue to take into account when it comes to colorists browsing through it. I know I wouldn't be able to go through ~15 posts of 20+ pairs. 8'I That's a shitton of pones.
So yeah. voted no. v':
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 11:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2015 5:57 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 17, 2015 1:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|