Welcome to Gaia! ::

Creating this because i have too. Want to talk? Go look for my sub-forum.

Doesn't organized anarchism defeat the purpose of anarchism?
Not to state the obvious.
ninja

3nodding
Call me Captain Obvious.

Anarchists just have to ban together to overthrow the government, then revert to anarchy.

Is that really that difficult?

Just so you know you've all got anarchy backwards. Anarchy is a gov't with no gov't, the perfection ideal, Utopia.

The chaos everyone thinks of is the propaganda of nixon's time, throwing mud on the name of a revelution to demoralize anyone who could be a potential advocate or associate of the potential uprising. Though the chaos is partly involved in the concept.

Anarchists believe that to over throw a gov't they must find intelligent, strong, brave, like minded people to help demoralize a gov't's people and create chaos. Using the tools of the forgotten or hidden or ignored spy-game. This tactic of using chaos to create chaos to create chaos to overthrow a gov't all within an organized fashion can be seen in the move "fight club". Though this only portrays the begining of the means.

At no point would an actual anarchist intentionally harm or injure anyone. They hold a high respect for mankind, even if it slides down a slippery path into moral abyss.

Unfortunately the collective of people who become interested in anarchism tend to be more interested in the lawless, take no prisoners idea of an armeggedon rather than the peace on earth without rule idea which is anarchy.

The basic ideals of an anarchis can be found by reading in entirety, "Civil Disobidience" by Henry David Thoreau, of which almost all american literature classes are required to read an excerpt from. Though I warn you by no means is the entire text of this piece exciting or as uplifting as the excerpt is.

So any of you who think Anarchy's means of achievement is a contradiction of itself, you're wrong. You've been mislead as to what anarchy really is, though one thing that anarchist know and anyone who has ever heard of it is.... EXTREMELY NOT LIKELY GOING TO HAPPEN.

Most humans are to greedy, jealous, zealous, and stubborn to ever come to terms with a Utopian society.

Yes it really is that difficult. Anarchists are well... anarchists. They tend to not get along well with others, especially other anarchists that don't share the exact belief of what anarchy represents. Some want a violent take over others want a peacful subversion. They all agree they want something differant but none of them can usually make up thier minds on how to do it. If they do make up thier minds they then can't figure out how to go about implementing thier ideas on a broad scale.

I agree with Emma Goldman. If you don't who she is your no anarchist. Read about her and read some of her work you'll get some ideas and hopefully people will start helping this country out.

Hello, I am new to this guild and I joined only because of this subforum

-GETTING IN TOPIC:

anarchism is filled of bias about it so I think that a good and smart move is to change the name razz

also a true anarchist is the one that has so high values and principals that can live among others with no need of a state controling them, thats why anarchy needs no gov, but like someone said its an utopia.

I think that we, true anarchist, should consider the option of rewrite capitalism, since as we all should know, he is not going away.