with thermodynamica, we found out that the way you look at things, definitely changes the outcome of your research.
No matter how you examine what happens, the way you set things up to have only 1 input variable; it determines the outcome. So its never an objective truth, it allways shows results of your own influence.
so we have our own influence which changes the outcome, and we have our interpretation of the outcome; none of these are objective. The truths we find are always subjective, subject to certain conditions and subjective to the limitations of our minds.
Truth, to my interpretation, is also allways subject to certain conditions.
If we think about our existence and ask ourselves questions of life,, i think the point where we start thinking is the place we find the answer.
If we'd start our question about existence/life while believing that God exists and He created us, no matter what fact we find, we interprete it according to our faith that God exists.. so no argument can change our faith.
On the other hand, if we'd start our question about existence/life while believing God does not exist, no matter what fact we find, we interprete it according to what we believe in to be true... so no argument can change that.
Faith is stronger than doubt. We all need something to believe in, wheter that is the existence of none-existence of a God.. we just need to be sure about that and all we can do after we made our choise is to agree to disagree.
code 5-12-5-14-1 Community Member 
|
|
